Could you choose your own legal code?: Crypto-libertarians
New to cryptocurrency
The crowd that erupted
June 7, 2021. El Salvador’s legislature voted to make Bitcoin legal tender. Bukele announced it at a Bitcoin conference in Miami. A sovereign nation adopted a monetary system no central bank controls. The IMF condemned it within hours. The World Bank refused to help. Which told us everything about what the experiment threatened.
We consider the nation-state a legacy system — seventeenth-century technology optimized for territorial control, running on constitutional firmware last updated in the 1940s. The engine replacing it is cryptographic governance. Smart contracts that execute without courts. DAOs that operate without boards. Alternative monetary systems that transfer value without banks.
Competition, not anarchy
The legal scholars say legitimacy. Legitimate according to whom? The British Crown considered the American Revolution illegitimate. China considers Taiwan illegitimate. Legitimacy is a claim made by the people who benefit from the current system.
Every criticism the pragmatists level — free riders, regulatory arbitrage, cost-shifting — describes the current system. The global banking system launders $2 trillion annually. The crime rate per dollar transacted is higher in legacy finance than crypto.
Governments that must compete for citizens will produce better governance the way competitive markets produce better products. Singapore competes with low taxes. Estonia with e-residency. We want the competition at full scale. Independence from monopoly, not from obligation.
Where we concede ground: The movement is overwhelmingly young, male, and financially comfortable. Our freedom accrues to people who already have the most of it.
What would change our mind: If the first five network-state experiments all produce plutocracy, ethnic sorting, and governance capture by largest holders.
Read the full synthesis: Could you choose your own legal code?