Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
  1. Home
  2. ›Hot take: states should STEAL crypto fro...

Hot take: states should STEAL crypto from insecure custodians operating inside their own borders.

J
johnky·...
software development · 4.2

$2 billion in crypto was stolen by North Korea in 2025.

Lax security isn’t a private failure.  It’s a national security risk. Every poorly protected exchange or bridge becomes low-hanging fruit for foreign adversaries, ransomware gangs, and sanctioned states.

If assets are going to be stolen anyway, better they’re stolen by the state than permanently lost to hostile actors.

This would function as a security tax.

Some fraction of the proceeds will be used to fund development of more sophisticated hacking techniques.

Some can go into a sovereign wealth fund.

The rest can return to the source wallet after the victims have proven they have tightened their security.

Invest properly in custody, or pay for failure

Incentives become immediate, not theoretical

Foreign attackers are denied easy access

We already ground unsafe aircraft and shut down non-compliant banks. Crypto shouldn’t get a free pass just because the theft is digital.

post image
cryptocurrency
public-policy
national-security
Comments
1