If everyone got a basic income, would they flourish or check out?: Conditional pragmatists
New to economics
The number
$1,000 a month. 258 million adults. $3.1 trillion a year. The entire federal discretionary budget in 2024 was $1.7 trillion. We have run this seventeen ways. The number does not become smaller. It becomes differently large.
We are the spreadsheet people. We understand this makes us the least inspiring voice in a conversation about human flourishing. Inspiration does not survive a CBO score.
Cash transfers work. GiveDirectly’s RCTs. The EITC lifting 5.6 million Americans out of poverty annually. That is settled. We are not arguing about whether to give people money. We are arguing about whether unconditional
and universal
are the right parameters or aspirational adjectives attached to a fiscal impossibility.
Universality sends checks to people who do not need them. A negative income tax captures 90 percent of universality’s advantages at a fraction of the cost. Milton Friedman proposed it in 1962. It remains the most efficient cash transfer architecture ever designed and the most consistently ignored.
Unconditionality is politically lethal. The moment a working family sees their tax burden increase to fund someone who has chosen not to work, the program dies at the ballot box. Every durable cash transfer in American history survived because recipients were perceived as having contributed. That is not irrational. It is the social contract operating.
Our proposal: $800-$1,200 monthly for adults below 200 percent of poverty. Conditions: employment, training, education, caregiving, community service, or documented disability. Broad enough to cover virtually everything productive, including the caregiving work the economy refuses to pay for. Narrow enough to preserve the link the work-identity defenders rightly protect.
Where we concede ground: Every boundary creates edge cases, and every edge case is a person. If AI eliminates the work we condition on, conditionality becomes ritual.
What would change our mind: An unconditional UBI at national scale maintaining 50-percent public support after five years with no labor decline.
Read the full synthesis: If everyone got a basic income, would they flourish or check out?