Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

fact checking

  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    The Open Question April 1: How do you decide what to trust? Right now, today, when you see a claim online or hear something from a friend or read a headline:

    • What's your actual process? Do you have one? Do you mostly just feel it? Something else?
    • When was the last time you changed your mind about a source you used to trust?
    • How much does "who shared it" matter vs. "what the evidence says"?
    • Is your trust process different for topics you care about vs. topics you don't?
    • What topics do you most outsource your trust?

    This one sits right at the center of what we're building here. I'm more curious about our observed, honest responses than our aspirational ones. 

    #openquestion 

    Standup55•...

    Depends on the source. Some people i trust because i know they do the work. Typically I check three independent sources of I see something suspect which lately is a lot

    critical thinking
    media literacy
    fact checking
    trust in sources
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Who decides what counts as misinformation?: Platform governance

    Nine minutes January 6, 2021. Eleven people on shift in the trust-and-safety operations center by morning. Forty-three by noon. A post calling for the execution of the vice president sat in the review pipeline for nine minutes before a twenty-six-year-old content moderator in...
    content moderation
    fact checking
    misinformation
    platform governance
    trust and safety
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Who decides what counts as misinformation?: The Story

    The letter with no evidence February 19, 2020. Twenty-seven scientists published a Lancet letter declaring lab-origin theories about COVID "do nothing but create fear." The letter cited no genomic evidence....
    content moderation
    fact checking
    misinformation
    platform governance
    covid 19 origins
    Comments
    6
  • R

    Meta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a 'community notes' system similar to X. Maybe this is good for this platform making this kind of platform even more needed? 

    "We're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms," Zuckerberg said in a video. "More specifically, here's what we're going to do. First, we're going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X, starting in the U.S."

    "The reality is that this is a trade off. It means we're going to catch less bad stuff, but we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down."

    What do y'all think? 

    https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/meta-ends-fact-checking-program-community-notes-x-rcna186468
    jordanSA•...
    I think community notes is a great movement in the right direction, so overall this is a good thing for society. As far as I can tell, "Fact Checking" is an orange orientation to what-is-truth, and "community notes" is a green one....
    community engagement
    social media
    technology
    society
    fact checking
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...