Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. ›Should Trump's 'anti-weaponization' fund...

Should Trump's 'anti-weaponization' fund pay abortion clinic protesters?

C
CalmintheCrazy·...
fandom · 1.1

No, I don't think so. I believe certainly there are people who did have their civil rights violated by getting arrested for protesting peacefully, however I think this is more of a case to bring against that specific town, police force, and clinic. In the case of the pastor that had his home raided and children terrorized, I think he should sue the FBI, the Federal government, the doj, and if possible the heads of those agencies and the leadership in office at that time. Basically he should find an attorney to open a civil case against the head of the FBI, Merrick Garland, the overzealous officers willing to carry out obviously illegal orders and name his wife and every child that lived through the ordeal. I am not an attorney so I don't know what that would entail, I just think it's in everyone's best interest to have these cases heard separate from this blanket fund for people who were pardoned and never should have been in jail to begin with. 

politics
civil-rights
law
Comments
0