Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

policy

  • K

    May I see Your ID Please. AT the top,l et me say I pride myself as being what I call a common sense Centrist, I think good governance is good governance simple as that.  I think Its Good for Gvt to defend our country, pave our roads, help people recover from disaster, provide Limited help to people who need ot be lifted out of poverty. You get the picture.  NOT good for GVT; tell me what books I can read, installing religious beliefs in schools,  basically stay out of my Beliefs.   

    Hopefully that qualifies me as a reasonable common sense human.  

    Having said that, Lets try this. 

    Some form of Identification requirement for Voting is not such a horribe Idea.  

    Some support for my Argument.

    If I want to FLY, I must provide a Gvt issued ID

    If I want to Operate a Motor Vehicle- I MUST have the GVT Issued License.

    If I want to go to the library I need a "card" to do So. 

    If I buy Tickets for a Show and go to Willcall to get the tix. I need to Provide ID.

    The Left says that VOTER ID would discourage Some from Voting.  The Rght says that attitude Proves that the Democrat leaders encourage Voter Fraud AND those fraudulent voters ALWAYS vote Democratic.  There is NO evidence tthat actually Happens in any organized way.  And, Who are these people that want to Vote Illegally, How many of them are out there.  Enough to change the outcome of elections?  Im a cynic on that Idea.

    Im Saying it's time to Put this debate to bed.  Provide a State Issued Voter ID.  

    In NJ The Motor Vehicle Comission Issues the "REAL ID". It has deep proof of who I am.  If the GVT trusts that and will let me get on a Plane, It seems to me that should Qualify as a way to verify I have a verified way to Vote.   

    jocawrites•...

    If it works in one state, it could work in others. Elegant solution! Thank you for sharing.

    governance
    policy
    Comments
    0
  • eccentricecon•...

    Hello

    Hi everyone — I’m Tarnell Brown. Still figuring out how this site works, but I’m jumping right in. I’m an economist who studies how institutional and structural incentives can hide the real costs of discrimination, especially for people who are already starting from behind....
    economics
    policy
    discrimination
    fairness
    institutional design
    Comments
    2
  • joshua avatar

    How do we get to a future with a more tech literate society? There are so many things that are coming down the pipeline that both sacrifice people’s technological freedoms and violate their privacy:

    • Google has recently decided to start determining who’s allowed to create apps that can be installed on Android.
    • Mississippi has passed an onerous and dangerous age verification check to social media sites that require them to obtain, retain sensitive information about their users.
    • Germany is in the process of making ad-blocking illegal on copyright grounds.
    • The EU has proposed chat control legislation that would make decryption of all messages by the government a requirement for all messaging apps, basically requiring a back door to all communication.

    Now, these are definitely varying degrees of ridiculousness, but they are just a subset of the attempts at eroding privacy and safety of people online.

    In the past, there have been major protests against similar attempts:

    • You might remember SOPA and PIPA blackouts on many major sites.
    • This is far from the first time that the EU has attempted to insert communication back doors.
    • A few years ago, Google’s attempt at enforcing particular software and software configurations being on user’s machines was rejected due to an outcry. (Web Environment Integrity)

    And while we’ve had those wins, the governments and corporations keep trying to force through efforts to control our electronic devices, how we interact with them, and what we’re allowed to do on them. And there have been successes in the interim:

    • Microsoft has basically tricked nearly all Windows users into tying their local Windows OS to online accounts and include invasive telemetry giving them constant access to your system.
    • Apple and Google have positioned themselves as trusted arbiters of what’s safe to install on your phone while letting through malware and scams on their own platforms.
    • The DMCA has been weaponized and misused by corporations to strike down content they don’t like and steal money from creators.
    • John Deere makes it illegal for farmers to operate on their own equipment costing them precious time while they wait for approved technicians to repair what they used to be able to do on their own.
    • Newer cars can be shut down on the whim of the manufacturer without any sort of due process of the owner.

    My theory is that tech literacy is going down. Sure, more and more people can use phones, but the understanding of how those devices work and the implications of these “attacks” on freedom to interact with them are not well spread.

    So, I ask, how do we get to a future with a society that understands better how technology works, that is better informed so they can push back against draconian legislation and company decisions?

    #FutureYouLove

    blakeSA•...
    Maybe this is too much speaking the party line =) but: the first thing that comes to me is, tech is already and also increasingly beyond any person's ability to understand it....
    technology
    trust systems
    policy
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...