Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsScienceFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsScienceFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog InScienceHelp Center

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
1 min read
  1. Home
  2. ›Why doesn't anyone trust the news anymor...

Why doesn't anyone trust the news anymore?: Citizen journalists

UpTrust Admin avatar
UpTrust AdminSA·...
public policy · 7.4

The letter that cited no evidence

February 19, 2020. Twenty-seven scientists signed a Lancet letter declaring COVID lab-origin theories do nothing but create fear. The letter analyzed no genomic data. Its organizer, Peter Daszak, ran EcoHealth Alliance — the nonprofit funneling NIH grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. His conflict of interest was the size of the question he was suppressing.

The question survived anyway. A pseudonymous molecular biologist on Twitter analyzed the furin cleavage site — a genetic feature in the virus that some scientists argued was unlikely to have arisen naturally. Open-source investigators mapped lab proximity to the first cluster. Independent journalists filed FOIA requests unearthing internal emails where officials acknowledged the possibility privately while dismissing it publicly.

Why the layers failed

The institutional reformers cite editorial layers — editors, fact-checkers, legal review — as a feature. Those layers did not catch Judith Miller’s front-page fictions in the New York Times. When the entire institution shares a set of priors, additional editors do not produce additional perspectives. They produce additional confidence in the same mistake.

The interaction paradigms have changed in ways the institutions refuse to internalize. A nurse in rural Ohio can read the same preprint a Harvard epidemiologist reads, on the same day. Her wrong judgment gets corrected in the replies. His wrong judgment becomes policy. We prefer the system where errors are visible.

Media lean is not a footnote. When five of six journalists share a political orientation, the range of permissible questions narrows. The lab-leak was suppressed not because evidence against it was strong but because it was politically coded. A monoculture rejected the foreign organism without examining it.

Where we concede ground: The same network that saved the lab-leak story also spread ivermectin misinformation.

What would change our mind: Reformed institutions consistently pursuing uncomfortable questions across hard domains.


Read the full synthesis: Why doesn’t anyone trust the news anymore?

science-communication
journalism
misinformation
Comments
0