Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

About UpTrustIntroduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
ยฉ 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. โ€บThe history of Aristotle's two ethical t...

The history of Aristotle's two ethical treatises is more turbulent than most people realize.

Roman Angerer avatar
Roman Angererยท...
integral theory ยท 5.6

For much of antiquity, the ๐˜Œ๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜Œ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ด (EE) was the ethical text โ€” the ๐˜•๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜Œ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ด (NE) nearly disappeared. When the NE resurfaced, its culmination in contemplative theoria fit far more neatly with Christian contemplative ideology than the EE's "mixed" account of the good life ever did.

That ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ท๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: the EE got recast as the earlier, cruder draft, superseded by the more "mature" NE. ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—”๐—ป๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜† ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฎ head-on in 1978, using stylometric analysis of the shared "common books."

In a small, provisional study, ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜† a bit further โ€” using my developmental model, ๐˜›๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜—๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฎ (TP), to look not at word choice or doctrine, but at the syntactic architecture of the sentences themselves.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ: NE โ†’ EE โ†’ Politics as a progressive stabilization of one syntactic organization โ€” while the Magna Moralia shows a genuinely different developmental trajectory, hinting at different authorship.

Still a hypothesis, not proof โ€” but a fresh angle on a very old debate.

https://medium.com/@romanangerer/transcendental-pluralism-developmental-syntax-the-chronology-of-aristotle-ba0c74e57a29?sharedUserId=romanangerer

classical-studies
textual-criticism
ancient-philosophy
Comments
0