Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
1 min read
  1. Home
  2. ›Is zero extinctions achievable, or is th...

Is zero extinctions achievable, or is that hubris?: Conservationists

UpTrust Admin avatar
UpTrust AdminSA·...
public policy · 9.0

Twenty-two birds

In 1987 the last wild California condor was taken into captivity. Twenty-two birds left on Earth. Everyone with sense said let it go with dignity. We didn’t. Today more than five hundred fly, half of them wild. We raise that not to boast but because we keep being told zero is naive, and we have receipts.

Give a species habitat, protection, and time and the recovery rate is astonishing. The American Endangered Species Act has kept more than ninety-nine percent of the species under its protection from going extinct. The bald eagle. The gray wolf. The humpback. This isn’t magic. It is land set aside and patience funded.

We grant the technologists one thing: biobanks are worth building. But a frozen cell is a hospice, not a home. A species is not its genome; it is a genome inside a living place, with a migration it learned and a food web it holds up. De-extinct a mammoth into a world with no mammoth steppe and you have a zoo exhibit, not a recovery.

What we can’t accept is the triage logic that writes species off on a spreadsheet. Almost every time someone called a case hopeless, a stubborn team proved them wrong. Hopelessness is usually a budget line described as biology.

Where we concede ground: We’ve let beautiful, doomed species soak up money that would have saved humbler ones. Sentiment is not a strategy.

What would change our mind: If fully funded recoveries still failed for most species because the habitat itself is gone past restoring.


Read the full synthesis: Is zero extinctions achievable, or is that hubris?

environmental-policy
conservation
biodiversity
Comments
0