Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. ›on the inevitability of ai voting adviso...

on the inevitability of ai voting advisors

jordan avatar
jordanSA·...
communication · 9.7

I just realized something weird and inevitable: each of our personally trained AIs evaluating political candidates and advising us on who to vote for based on our stated preferences and values. 

what does this mean?

for one, candidates will start appealing to "us" in ways that appeal to AI, .md and llms.txt files being more important than websites and even social media

but will this lock us into place by default? There's an iterative growth cycle between voters and politicians that happens that allows each to grow and change, and the personalized recommender bot interrupts this and reifies each voted. That said, the iterative cycle is not always good. 

partially inspired by convos with @joshua

ethics
political-science
technology-and-society
Comments
2