Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. ›Discussion of border/immigration answers

Discussion of border/immigration answers

jhrosenberg@gmail.com avatar
jhrosenberg@gmail.com·...
politics · 2.4

I have the sense that Vance/Trump probably want to be fairly inhumane in deporting extremely large numbers of people. Various quotes I’ve seen from them have suggested this (though I’d like to fact check myself at some point).

But Vance does a very effective job of sounding more reasonable during the debate on this. Starts with things most people would agree with: secure the border; focus on deporting criminals, etc. E.g. on deporting criminals: that’s a place where perhaps I’d be supportive in extreme cases but where I’d want to be much more humane in minor cases which might be the vast majority of relevant ones. E.g. does getting a speeding ticket make you a criminal?

Noting I have lots of uncertainty and lack of knowledge here. But have the sense that reasonable rhetoric could hide extreme action that I wouldn’t support…

human-rights
politics
law-enforcement
Comments
2