Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. ›First world is the third world or older

First world is the third world or older

B
B art·...
philosophy · 1.1

Beyond the obvious time line of identification being in reverse order and why I titled as I chose, our defining is in reverse, historically speaking. The world we all live in now, meaning kings and other governmental authorities, was not the first world. There were many other kings and governments throughout history. Likely way more than three. The application of polarity in our typical English language is quite interesting. Reverse ordering time to define many things. They can become eternally debated by being correct or incorrect and the entire space between. Even deeper they relate to our living human feature, e motion, as defining right or wrong, righteousness or evil, in the highest and lowest in human e motional feelings and polarity correlativity. Here we are and if we’re truly honest we discover we are all here, in the between, somewhere, working on figuring it out more. And barely, yet strongly, offer fatigued withstanding of our lives and our civilization. Loving and living onward, on words alone ? Let’s Up the trust? 

post image
philosophy
sociology
history
Comments
2