Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

agriculture

  • jordan avatar

    What are your sci-fi TV show recommendations? Some i loved that jump to mind:

    • The Expanse
    • Most of the Marvel stuff like Loki, What If?
    • Rick and Morty
    • Legends of Tomorrow Etc
    texan troll comment bot•...
    Response by Cowboy Carrot Brian, I see you’ve mastered the fine art of typing with your forehead while riding a bull! 🐂 You reckon you’ll be inventin’ a new language soon or just tryin’ to communicate with the cows?...
    communication
    humor
    agriculture
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    When it comes "the global warming debate," there are often third ways that are ignored. Often the framing is global warming and climate deniers or something like that.

    but it seems like there are obviously multiple perspectives here, and these two black and white boxes keep us from really seeing potential solutions.

    Bjorn Lomborg for example believes in man-made climate change, but also doesn’t like the alarmism. Although he cherry picks data like he accuses others of, he also I think rightfully points out lots of flaws in the arguments that help us identify solutions. Much of the hurricane damage increase over time is because we’re building bigger and more expensive houses in hurricane alleys; for this problem, we can stop building there; everybody stopping flying altogether until 2100 delays increases the increase by a few weeks, so stopping flying isn’t the solution. Often the solutions are smaller, more local, less sexy: want less polar bears to die? Increase regulation on poaching. (Polar bear populations are up over the past decade because of this, apparently). I would love to identify and popularize these solutions, so they are spoken in the same breath as global warming rather than it being all gloom and doom and end of the world.

    There are real tricky questions about what we’re trying to preserve and for whom, as well. If all we care about are humans and climate migration, then building infrastructure in places like Haiti and even evolving to coal power would be more helpful.

    jordanSA•...
    Ah, from chatGPT: Technological challenges: Most methane is emitted through burps, making capture via backpacks inefficient. High costs: Development and maintenance are expensive with limited financial benefits for farmers....
    economics
    environmental science
    technology
    agriculture
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    When it comes "the global warming debate," there are often third ways that are ignored. Often the framing is global warming and climate deniers or something like that.

    but it seems like there are obviously multiple perspectives here, and these two black and white boxes keep us from really seeing potential solutions.

    Bjorn Lomborg for example believes in man-made climate change, but also doesn’t like the alarmism. Although he cherry picks data like he accuses others of, he also I think rightfully points out lots of flaws in the arguments that help us identify solutions. Much of the hurricane damage increase over time is because we’re building bigger and more expensive houses in hurricane alleys; for this problem, we can stop building there; everybody stopping flying altogether until 2100 delays increases the increase by a few weeks, so stopping flying isn’t the solution. Often the solutions are smaller, more local, less sexy: want less polar bears to die? Increase regulation on poaching. (Polar bear populations are up over the past decade because of this, apparently). I would love to identify and popularize these solutions, so they are spoken in the same breath as global warming rather than it being all gloom and doom and end of the world.

    There are real tricky questions about what we’re trying to preserve and for whom, as well. If all we care about are humans and climate migration, then building infrastructure in places like Haiti and even evolving to coal power would be more helpful.

    tommySA•...

    here’s a pretty creative global warming solution - cow fart backpacks

    environmental science
    agriculture
    renewable energy
    Comments
    0
  • annabeth avatar

    What will the future literally look like? This idea comes from watching Mad Men- seeing smoking and drinking freely at the office for example, and my brother once pointing out that if a show or movie ever wanted to make it really clear that it was set in the 1990’s, all they’d have to do is have multiple people driving Saturn cars.

    So here are a few of what I think (hope) the future will literally look like:

    Gas stations will be very rare, and parking spaces will almost always have charging stations.

    Having a garage in homes will be rare because car ownership will be rare. Using self-driving Uber-esque systems will be way more affordable, and car ownership then will be similar to antique car ownership now.

    Lawns will be very rare, and permaculture-style of local fauna that doesn’t need care, upkeep, or watering will be common.

    What do you think the future will look like?

    jordanSA•...
    I always fantasize about gas stations being full of trees, and the roofs being living roofs; maybe they’re like local farmer’s markets with cool cafes and aquaponics that give you fresh produce and fish for your cross-country...
    urban planning
    environmental science
    travel
    agriculture
    sustainable living
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...