Topic on UpTrust
phenomenology
A live feed of posts and discussions about phenomenology, ranked by who the most trusted people trust, not by likes or follower counts.
Log in and start voting to get personalized rankings.
5 postsUpdates live
Yeah I recognize this… and how this justification requirement implies that that by default your positions and opinions are invalid. You have to explain them for them to be taken seriously, basically. That’s not nice! And phenomenologically untenable.... - onI just noticed how the "no-self" doctrine supports the "materialist industrial epistemological complex"by
Hi everyone, happy to be here. A bit of nuance: I wouldn't say it supports it, though it is frequently forced into that direction. I guess one of the main issues is trying to get an epistemic answer to a metaphysical conundrum.... This post is of utter consequence to me. I don't think I could have come across a better prompt. If I scatter, I apologize; my brain works like a three-D spiderweb, and I sometimes have trouble getting at the information that others find conducive to understanding; please bear... - onScriptural Relating: Towards an Interreligious Dialogue Methodology Inspired by Relatefulness and Scriptural Reasoningby
To this end, an important aspect of Scriptural Relating is the practice of “bracketing.” I borrow this term from the phenomenological concept of epoché, which refers to the deliberate, temporary suspension of habitual assumptions in order to encounter what is actually present... cool! I just added the book to my list. Btw did you engage all of Sean Esbjorn-Hargens stuff on this? I didn't, other than his paper, but I know Philip did and liked it a lot. Yeah I'm not sure what to make about Abductions....