phenomenology
What is thriving?: Phenomenologists
The moment without duration There is a moment in meditation — not every sitting, not on schedule — when the boundary between the one observing and the thing observed dissolves. You are not watching your breath. Something prior to the categories opens.... Micro-transformation: Seeing how meaning makes up a me
What’s something you’re making sense of right now? Anything… for example “There’s music over there.” or “My mom wants me to be more involved with the family.” OK here’s the practice: notice how the meaning not only requires a separate you (there and here are separate, mom and me... Awareness always is (?)
I resisted writing about this partially because I’m afraid it’s boring, and partially because of the inherent limitations of languaging this stuff, and my own limits, but I’ve found the process extremely helpful for clarifying my own thinking.... Boycotting Explanation. I've been experimenting lately with refusing to explain in relationship.
I was raised by a lawyer and legal assistant and in the context of my upbringing being able to explain myself and my experience/emotions/etc (and implicitly justify myself) was my ticket to my experiences/emotions/etc being received as valid, worthy of care and attention, and so on.
I have a hunch that this taught me to collude to manipulate/be manipulated by the habit/expectation of explanation - the implicit currency of justification seems possibly insidious and so far, since I've experimented with abstaining from it, otherwise unnecessary.
#quicktakes
Yeah I recognize this… and how this justification requirement implies that that by default your positions and opinions are invalid. You have to explain them for them to be taken seriously, basically. That’s not nice! And phenomenologically untenable.... I just noticed how the "no-self" doctrine supports the "materialist industrial epistemological complex". My friend Divia has coined this intense-but-great phrase "So “materialist epistemology industrial complex” is my own mental handle, and it might be silly but I like it for now.
I claim that there’s some memeset that launders legitimacy from “everything is made out of stuff in a refuctionistic way, seems like the laws of physics"
And today I was noticing how the Buddhist doctrine of 'no-self' contributes to this whole way of thinking—
by denying that there's a self (claiming instead what we call a "self" are five aggregrates/skandas that interact in a way that seems selfy but doesn't actually constitute a real thing) this thinking can fall trap to leaving the so-called objective/external world pre-existent, out-there, reducing it to just physics.
—at least as its imported into the USA. And probably not how it is interpreted by deep Mahayana practitioners, for example, or people who have actually reached the nondual nirvana state advertised by the practice and that gave rise to the doctrine, who would experience this as a false duality and notice that whatever we normally think of a subject would need to be included/accounted for in/as the object.Hi everyone, happy to be here. A bit of nuance: I wouldn't say it supports it, though it is frequently forced into that direction. I guess one of the main issues is trying to get an epistemic answer to a metaphysical conundrum.... UAP are real and artifacts from non human intelligence. I just attended an event wt the capital factory in austin with some really respected people and now I’m wanting to come out: I’m convinced that UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena, the less stigmatized word for UFO):
- are real
- are craft from Non Human Intelligences (aliens)
- USA gov and aerospace companies have actual materials from these craft and someone has an actual craft
- have been hidden for security reasons for decades
- we need to de-classify so we can put the weight of the usa innovation, research and capital markets to learn about this stuff and create technologies that benefit the wellbeing of humanity
- we can learn to engineer einsteins relativity the way we learned to engineer Maxwell’s equations to do the crazy stuff people are seeing and seem
Impossible
cool! I just added the book to my list. Btw did you engage all of Sean Esbjorn-Hargens stuff on this? I didn't, other than his paper, but I know Philip did and liked it a lot. Yeah I'm not sure what to make about Abductions....