existentialism
What happens to society if we live to 150?: Philosophical objectors
Being-toward-death Heidegger used a phrase that resists translation: Sein-zum-Tode — being-toward-death. You are not a being who happens to die. You are a being whose entire relationship to time, meaning, and commitment is structured by the fact that you will die.... Enough/not enough are the same. If you’ve lived in the shadow of not-enoughness for most of your life, there often comes a moment where you declare “I am enough!” It feels glorious! Triumphant!
It’s a step forward, I guess. But it keeps the whole busted frame in place.
“Enough” and “not enough” are built from the same mental overlay, which frankly is bullshit. You are. That’s unquestionable, and there were no requirements for your being. American culture, or your parents, or Instagram may have convinced you that you had to earn your right to exist (or be loved) but they lied.
One reason we make this mistake is because the frame of “enough” legitimately applies to specific goals: if I don’t have enough gas to drive to Louisiana, I won’t make it there. If I don’t have enough followers, I won’t get the brand sponsorship. But these all concern capacity relative to goals, not existence. Enoughness cannot be a statement of being. Being is. It’s tautological. Recognizing this tautology is transformative, because it undermines the whole edifice of enough/not-enough.
#TTTI love Tom! what does "to get to Being" mean, in a context where Being is whether or not we get to it? Are we "getting to" a moment's feeling or recognition or cognitive overlay or subjective awareness, or ongoing (which overlays some ontology of time and consistent personhood... Meaning Crisis, or Meaning of X, or ....
I spoke to a friend this past weekend who recently took the package from a federal agency, and is likely going to have trouble finding new employment.... Awareness always is (?)
I resisted writing about this partially because I’m afraid it’s boring, and partially because of the inherent limitations of languaging this stuff, and my own limits, but I’ve found the process extremely helpful for clarifying my own thinking.... Life of Chuck
I saw Life of Chuck with a couple friends a few days ago. They reference Carl Sagan- “We are latecomers. We live in the last moments of the Cosmic Calendar. The history of the universe is immense, almost beyond comprehension.... Your self doesn't ultimately exist. . Your self doesn't ultimately exist.
Well, ain't that the kind of high-minded fuckin' philosophy that finds its way to my ears after enough whiskey's been poured? The more power a man accumulates, the more he starts to wonder if there's anyone actually sittin' behind his eyes, or if it's just stories all the way... I Don't Have To. I’ve had an intellectual understanding that I don’t have to do things, but I’ve recently realized that it was tethered to old beliefs.
I don’t have to visit my grandmother if I’m willing to be a bad granddaughter/bad person.
orI don’t have to buy my friend a birthday present if I’m willing to be a shitty friend.
I’m freshly looking at a new version of
I don’t have to
which is just a literal seeing of reality without the tether.I don’t have to clean up my stepmother’s hoarding house after she dies.
It’s just true, I literally don’t have to.I had this experience when I was in college and one of my mentors was dying and I spent 24 hours in a daze really contemplating what does it mean to die…....