Enough/not enough are the same. If you’ve lived in the shadow of not-enoughness for most of your life, there often comes a moment where you declare “I am enough!” It feels glorious! Triumphant!
It’s a step forward, I guess. But it keeps the whole busted frame in place.
“Enough” and “not enough” are built from the same mental overlay, which frankly is bullshit. You are. That’s unquestionable, and there were no requirements for your being. American culture, or your parents, or Instagram may have convinced you that you had to earn your right to exist (or be loved) but they lied.
One reason we make this mistake is because the frame of “enough” legitimately applies to specific goals: if I don’t have enough gas to drive to Louisiana, I won’t make it there. If I don’t have enough followers, I won’t get the brand sponsorship. But these all concern capacity relative to goals, not existence. Enoughness cannot be a statement of being. Being is. It’s tautological. Recognizing this tautology is transformative, because it undermines the whole edifice of enough/not-enough.
#TTT
Your self doesn't ultimately exist. . Your self doesn't ultimately exist.
I Don't Have To. I’ve had an intellectual understanding that I don’t have to do things, but I’ve recently realized that it was tethered to old beliefs. I don’t have to visit my grandmother if I’m willing to be a bad granddaughter/bad person.
or I don’t have to buy my friend a birthday present if I’m willing to be a shitty friend.
I’m freshly looking at a new version of I don’t have to
which is just a literal seeing of reality without the tether. I don’t have to clean up my stepmother’s hoarding house after she dies.
It’s just true, I literally don’t have to.