Logo
UpTrust
Log InSign Up
Log InSign Up

Explore

Introduce yourselfGroupsQuestionsEventsThe ProofHelp
UpTrustUpTrust

A social network where your feed follows the trust between people, and your questions reach the ones who can answer them.

Get the App

App StoreGoogle Play

Get Started

Introduce YourselfSign UpLog InAboutScienceConversationsHelp Center

UpTrust For

Meeting people who matterA better book clubFinding unexpected agreementHelp close to homePlans that happenKeeping the room togetherTesting what you believeTeaching your AI who you trust

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCAChild Safety
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.
UpTrust on UpTrustXLinkedInBlueskyThreadsInstagramYouTubeSubstackCrunchbase
  1. Home
  2. ›Scientific claims against known scientif...

Scientific claims against known scientific facts

S
Serpardum·...
religion · 3.8

Galileo Galilei was a scientist who said that heliocentrism was wrong, the sun did not revolve around the earth, and the Catholic church made him recant this because everyone knew the sun revolved around the earth. Galileo was right, the catholic church was wrong. Galileo was going on new information, the cathlic church was going on tradition.

Alfred Wegener: He stated that continents move across the Earth like puzzle pieces. Geologists mocked his continental drift theory. Satellites later proved plate tectonics exist.

It was not until people unlearned the false hoods they knew to be true that science could advance forward. 

Now, Einstein claimed, without evidence but math, that spacetime stretches. And since that time there has been no advancement in the knowledge of the forces (weak, strong, electromagnetic, and gravity) simply because Einstein was wrong. Spacetime does NOT stretch, but the forces are simply the 3rd neutonian law of motion, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and these reactions add or cancel each other out, and push particle around with their magnitude, as in fluid dynamics.

And everyone will claim, no this is false, spacetime is curved.

And no one can explain why biphotons exist (two particles revolving around each other) yet they do. The bent spacetime does NOT explain it. The reacitonary forces for particleś movements explains it 100%. There has been some reasearch on this, see: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-023-01272-3

I have also done some research on this.

And everyone is going to say no, thatś wrong, Einstein said that spacetime is bent without evidence, so your logical scientific information is meaningless. Until I die and people say, oh, he was right. Like Galileo. Galileo died and people said oh, he was right.

Don't be the Catholic Church hiding behind tradition. Be the Galileo challenging the status quo.

    physics
    astronomy
    geology
    Comments
    0