## The word that shattered
In 2023, Pew found that 80 percent of Americans say they believe in God. When asked what they mean, responses fractured so completely the researchers abandoned their coding scheme. Some meant a person who listens. Some meant a force. Some meant the laws of physics experienced with reverence. Some meant something they felt once, in a hospital room or on a mountain, that they never successfully described.
The word held. The referent shattered.
## Four people who cannot agree
A woman in Lagos wakes before dawn to pray, repeating words until they dissolve and something else remains. A physicist at CERN measures the curvature of spacetime and feels what she can only call awe, and resents being told the awe requires a supernatural explanation. A Zen practitioner in Kyoto sits for forty minutes and reports undifferentiated oneness he will not call God and will not call not-God. A philosopher in Claremont reads Whitehead and builds a metaphysics where God is the world's own capacity to feel its way forward.
The demographic weight is staggering — 5.5 billion across Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism organizing their lives around a God who is personal, a being who knows you. The epistemic challenge is equally heavy: in most Western universities, the position is not that the question doesn't matter but that the word obscures the real sources of awe, packaging mystery in the costume of an answer. Harder to classify is what happens in a Kyoto zendo or a Sufi prayer circle — experiences that resist translation, states where the self dissolves, reported by across every tradition and century. And arriving late, a metaphysics built to hold all three: , where God is real but not supernatural, persuading but never coercing, the world's own capacity to feel its way forward.
## The question that changes the questioner
The convergence is buried but real. Every camp agrees the question is load-bearing. Even naturalists who reject the word acknowledge that what it points at — the impulse to ask why anything exists, the experience of the world as sacred — is not a disorder to be cured.
A person who says "a personal creator" and a person who says "the self-organizing tendency of matter" and a person who says "I can't tell you, but I've been there" are not just disagreeing about metaphysics. They are living in different worlds. Each world works, for the person inside it, well enough to build a life on. The question persists because answering it changes the answerer.
Where do you stand?
Join the conversation →