Topic on UpTrust
theoretical physics
A live feed of posts and discussions about theoretical physics, ranked by who the most trusted people trust, not by likes or follower counts.
Log in and start voting to get personalized rankings.
5 posts1 trusted voiceUpdates live
Trust ranks through the site stewards' curated lens.
- Corbomite...
Can I write a chemistry-like balancing formalism for A=1 operations, where coherence, phase-locking partnerships,…
Can I write a chemistry-like balancing formalism for A=1 operations, where coherence, phase-locking partnerships, density-flow, session counts and lattice resources all balance across an operation, and measurement falls out as a subcase rather than a separate postulate?... Read the full post - Corbomite...imported
Can the lattice produce a CMB acoustic-peak spectrum that survives contact with data?
Can the lattice produce a CMB acoustic-peak spectrum that survives contact with data? This is the single most dangerous point for the whole framework and I’d rather find out than not.
- onHow far can familiar quantum behavior be reproduced bottom-up by explicitly following particles and local fields rather than beginning with a wavefunction description?bySerpardum...
Only by creating a phsyics engine that follows the actual laws of physics, which I am working on. First one has to comprehend what the forces actually are, and they are simply reactions to particles movements, the 3rd neutonian law in action.... Can you give an example of this “ we can learn to engineer einsteins relativity the way we learned to engineer Maxwell’s equations to do the crazy stuff people are seeing and seem Impossible”?