Topic on UpTrust
intellectual property law
A live feed of posts and discussions about intellectual property law, ranked by who the most trusted people trust, not by likes or follower counts.
Log in and start voting to get personalized rankings.
8 postsUpdates live
- Alfiealfie...
People can’t sell work they don’t own. Companies don’t want to pay ai users to create stuff that They can’t exclusively control the IP of. Direct to consumer AI tools are just marketing for enterprise level tools for big tech.... I think compensating the people who the AI is drawing from would be wonderful. The idea that “if the AI knows who to replicate, it knows who to compensate” is elegant and compelling.... If the AI knows who to replicate, it knows who to compensate. Spotify compensates the artists who put their music on spotify. AI companies are sitting on piles of cash, directly replicating art via specific consumer demand, and it would be very simple to provide compensation to... When you say relative do you mean absolute dollars or percentage of income, or? A bit of both? To expand the "broke studio" example: I was imagining a small studio who spent all their money to produce some art that was enjoyed by many.... There's something compelling about this idea but I think the attention-grabbiness of it obfuscates the complex reality it's trying to highlight. some scattered thoughts that point toward a similar territory, IMO It seems to me protecting IP has done a lot of good, and will likely... A lot of IP law does seem weird. Digital technology a playground for post-scarcity, but large companies are intent on maximum "value extraction" from the ideas they generate.... - nat...
I get really curious about what these leftover feelings are that you haven’t attended to and what it means… what is the undesired outcome… if you give CE your attention....