Absolutely not. Although I strongly feel that AI has already proven itself useful in certain respects - and that it will continue to do so (with CONSCIENTIOUS, human guidance), as an avocational musician (and fervent music fan), I vehemently object to the trend which has already...
What are your thoughts on the future of AI and IP Law from an economic perspective? For example, the fair use doctrine protects freedom of expression by allowing a person to use a copyrighted work without permission in certain circumstances (e.g., parody, news reporting)....
People can’t sell work they don’t own. Companies don’t want to pay ai users to create stuff that They can’t exclusively control the IP of. Direct to consumer AI tools are just marketing for enterprise level tools for big tech....
There technically are in intellectual property law in the USA. The reasons any AI model may have done a good job in making any “art” that is not uncanny valley like is because of the actual artists work these companies basically stole all human expression from the internet....
I think compensating the people who the AI is drawing from would be wonderful.
The idea that “if the AI knows who to replicate, it knows who to compensate” is elegant and compelling....
I get really curious about what these leftover feelings are that you haven’t attended to and what it means… what is the undesired outcome… if you give CE your attention....