Does Pursuing Our Passions Mean We Are in Crisis? It seems in life whenever we decide to actively pursue our dreams or child-like passions, we are labeled as having a crisis.
A mid-life crisis, an existential crisis, a post divorce crisis, postpartum crisis.
Why is this? Is it because going for what we love threatens other people?
Or is it because it takes a crisis to wake us up to how we are living in complacency. From there, we can begin to move forward and live authentically?
I would love to know your thoughts as I ponder a newsletter post on this topic.
self-improvement
You drift off
We are in the hot tub talking. "I don't know what you want me to do," she says. "What?" "You drift off for fifteen minutes, and I can ask you about what we were just talking about, but then you look at me like I'm crazy because that was so long ago." "I do?" "Yeah, and I feel... From Brain into Body. When not knowing what to do next, rather then trying to logically figure it out with your brain, ask your body...
what do you desire?
See where it takes you
This can be very tricky. In my experience body led has a clean feel to it. It is the voice in the quiet still place inside. That voice in the stillness will continue to "ring true" no matter how loud other responses are- conditioned responses telling you not to listen to your... If You Can't Make Peace With Your Partner, How Can You Expect to Make Peace in the World? AMA with Annie Lalla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_5TMc--Or8Honestly it all depends on, if you're both willing to suffer for each other to gain knowledge and understanding of each other. To have a future of understanding, as a team who is truly the one that you can love.... AMA with Hannah Aline Taylor. Wednesday 2/4 at 4:00 PM CT
love, boundaries, and mistakes in relating, community, and peopling together (+ thank god love doesn’t look like you expect it to)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYNL05PRBQCurious if either / both of you agree: We are each responsible for ourselves - for our experiences, our choices, and our outcomes - and accountable to each other (in relationship). Personal Responsibility + Interpersonal Accountability = Relational Synergy. Response-ability.... AMA with Jeffrey Ladish. Wednesday 2/4 at 2:00 PM CT
Executive director of Palisade Research; studying AI loss of control risks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALfhq3r7Cz0Something that makes you aware of how long you've pursued something and indicates the gap between where you started and where you are. IMPORTANT! It would be heaven if they could hold the ideas clearly enough -mark them; create a branch thread to be followed later?- so you could... AMA with Ali Beiner. Wednesday 2/4 at 11:00 AM CT
Kainos host Alexander Beiner exploring cultural sensemaking around psychedelics, popular culture, philosophy, psychology, alternative economics, and spirituality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IlAi-r2kZkWas the "How do you maintain the drive..." question prompted by some of my input? I can't respond except by a new comment, so... I CHOOSE! It's not easy. I have cried, I have argued with myself but, I always choose to believe.... Oversimplified Mindsets
I often find that in times of great stress or uncomfortable situations, what I considered disadvantages have become of great strength. People are often told one of two extremes: their station is all their fault or it isn't.... Daily Frequency Tarot Spread
Card 1: The Tower indicates a sudden, disruptive shift in your current frequency. This could feel unsettling, but it clears the way for something new. Card 2: The Knight of Pentacles reversed suggests a lack of progress or a feeling of being stuck in what you are attracting.... Personal and Interpersonal Action
This is a distinction I make a lot with my coaching clients. 1) Action is good. Having epiphanies, emotional breakthroughs, insights etc, all of that is great, and occasionally life changing.... looks like I've been wrong and spreading misinformation about the disproven "triune brain theory".
The final—and most important—problem with this mistaken view is the implication that anatomical evolution proceeds in the same fashion as geological strata, with new layers added over existing ones. Instead, much evolutionary change consists of transforming existing parts.
- From https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963721420917687#con1
I have definitely made this mistake, many many times.
I'm not sure yet the implications of recognizing instead that "all vertebrates possess the same basic brain regions, here divided into the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain;" in some ways it seems like a nuance, but in other ways I think it'll shift how I see things and talk about things.
more quotes in case you don't read the article:
neural and anatomical complexity evolved repeatedly within many independent lineages
the correct view of evolution is that animals radiated from common ancestors (Fig. 1c). Within these radiations, complex nervous systems and sophisticated cognitive abilities evolved independently many times. For example, cephalopod mollusks, such as octopus and cuttlefish, possess tremendously complex nervous systems and behavior (Mather & Kuba, 2013), and the same is true of some insects and other arthropods (Barron & Klein, 2016; Strausfeld, Hansen, Li, Gomez, & Ito, 1998). Even among nonmammalian vertebrates, brain complexity has increased independently several times, particularly among some sharks, teleost fishes, and birds (Striedter, 1998).
The idea that larger brains can be equated with increased behavioral complexity is highly debatable (Chittka & Niven, 2009).
yes! this was my big takeaway from this realization too. It doesnt necessarily diminish the usefulness of any given frame to realize the causal mechanism and justification was totally baloney; it's honestly probably a lot more helpful bc then people are holding their frames...