Topic on UpTrust
debate analysis
A live feed of posts and discussions about debate analysis, ranked by who the most trusted people trust, not by likes or follower counts.
Log in and start voting to get personalized rankings.
4 posts2 trusted voicesUpdates live
Daily Alchemy: a question to think on together
“When you decide who to trust with your vote, what do you most want from a candidate in a debate: a clash of ideas, or a calm look at how they think?”
Trust ranks through the site stewards' curated lens.
- Philip...
Yeah, this definitely isn’t as cut and dry as the last two debates. I do think Vance seemed more poised and, well, cool. Walz is a great speaker, but his schoolteacher vibes I think can be a little offputting.... Vance seems extremely well prepared and confident, guessing that reflects on his intelligence and work ethic. Walz is getting stronger as the debate goes on, I think that reflects his determination.
One Debate, Two Approaches to Developmental Assessment
Can explicit linguistic measures add something to AI-based developmental interpretation? I reanalysed the El-Sayed–Rogers debate using our Transcendental Pluralism assessment prototype: a parser, explicit rules for grouping meaningful units, and abstraction heuristics....