Paying attention. We cannot keep paying attention to content that outrages us and offers nothing in regards to solutions. It feels like most apps are full of carnival barkers that continue to get more and more extreme with time. I have been on Meta since 2011 and deleted my accounts. The fact that so many people feel trapped by these apps and dependent on them to conduct business or stay connected to their communities is a big problem to solve. I am thinking about creating a zine. What are some other solutions people see for decentralizing and being more mindful of the content they create?
ethics in technology
AMA with Rob Miles on AI Safety. Wednesday, 2/4 at 1:00pm CT
AISafety.info founder has spent years telling the world about risk posed by strong AI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tYqqb6AjTMMets are notoriously bad at fixing these issues, ethics , spying on users and generally caring about their well being to begin with. They also removed content moderation. From all their platforms hence the porn.... AMA with Jeffrey Ladish. Wednesday 2/4 at 2:00 PM CT
Executive director of Palisade Research; studying AI loss of control risks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALfhq3r7Cz0How would/should the "strengths" of AI (or an AI) be evaluated or identified? As when you are identifying the best job candidate or you have to decide between two individuals who want to throw a birthday party for you?... AMA with Jeffrey Ladish. Wednesday 2/4 at 2:00 PM CT
Executive director of Palisade Research; studying AI loss of control risks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALfhq3r7Cz0This might be a whack Q but Imma ask it anyhow: Have any AIs been found working on their 'own' problems/projects/tasks that are arguably not meaningfully contributing to formulating their response to whatever they've been instructed to direct energy into?... AMA with Rob Miles on AI Safety. Wednesday, 2/4 at 1:00pm CT
AISafety.info founder has spent years telling the world about risk posed by strong AI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tYqqb6AjTMRe: Responsible AI development and deployment? My thoughts... Discuss and define expectations... Move away from the economic and competitive obsessions... Should happen anyway in relation to MANY societal issues!!!... AMA with Nate Soares. Wednesday 2/4 at 10am CT
Author of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies answers questions about why superhuman AI would kill us all.
I like how you’re thinking about this. Even if people disengage from online discourse, AI doesn’t go away — it just becomes less visible and more embedded in systems that shape daily life.... AMA with Nate Soares
Wednesday 2/4 at 10am CT
Author of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies answers questions about why superhuman AI would kill us all.
Claude's character training
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-character (From June. There’s also an audio version there, nice to hear Amanda Askell share some personal takes.) Over the past few months, I keep feeling more like asking for Claude’s help on various stuff, and less like asking for ChatGPT’s... Why you should post more: Everything is a mirror of everything.
We’re all censoring most of our awareness.
Uptrust is a currently curated community where we can actually practice thinking.
The more I post the more direct I’m being with everyone in my life. (I have an embedded belief that if I do anything anywhere then I should that anything in more everywheres…but I still curate).
Post about why you’re not posting.
Post about questions you’re asking yourself.
Post about your anxiety.
Post to express art.
This shit won’t last, this fun safe newborn ward. Use this time now to try something. Create a fake name or another account so you can try it from anonymity.
Huge opportunity to bust out of our norms.
this is validating—one of my claims is that we have to make UpTrust good for purely egocentric aims as well, as long as those aims are boundaried such that someone being egocentric on the platform benefits the platform (and vice-versa the platform’s success benefits... Racism through a developmental lens. unfinished draft…
note: I’m totally uninformed here…Red: Does this benefit me?
Amber: My race is simply better (or worse) than yours. We perpetuate it because that’s good.
Orange:
Racism
is a thing we transcend by being worldcentric and meritocratic; we perpetuate it by constantly looking at everything through the racism lens.Green: Systemic racism is everywhere (and at the root of many of our social problems); we transcend it by balancing the scales with education and programs to help the victims and stop the perpetrators; we perpetuate it by taking advantage of our privileges, ignoring it, and doing nothing.
Teal: Systemic racism is real, but it’s mostly an unconscious self-organizing system that’s perpetuated because of the incentives that keep things how they are. We transcend by owning our projection, and by setting up systems that reward non-racism for each level of development in the currency that level values.
Turquoise: We never transcend racism, it’s a construct we enact through conscious embracing and boundarying/channeling or we enact through ignorance.
All these are frames that enact world-experiences that overlap, and they’re all us; these frames keep us from being in awareness and seeing awareness as the stuff the frames are made of-which is the way out of the self-referential self refuting trap of this frame into unity of experience…
note: This doesnt mean everyone who’s using the surface language of
systemic racism
or whatever is actually at that level—for example there’s a red green alliance that usesGreen
language because it benefits them directly; there’s an amber-green alliance that uses green language to make their in-group good/better and make others wrong/bad.i don’t think chatgpt is a good resource for developmental levels. It’s not very good at actually stepping outside of it’s own developmental lens. For examples in the other comment it assumes all the lenses dont like racism or want it to go away, whereas I think you can imagine a... What's good about Trump? I don't follow (American national) politics a ton, but I know Trump is an incredibly divisive figure who just got convicted of 34 felony counts, while still being favored as the Republican candidate for the next presidential race.
What's good about him, what he's done, and his policies? For example, less death in foreign wars—even the biased ChatGPT admits:
Trump's foreign policy led to fewer foreign deaths due to a reduction in large-scale military engagements, and his administration did not initiate new large-scale wars or military interventions—a significant departure from previous administrations that engaged in extensive military campaigns, such as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
really? I’m surprised in this particular case—I thought it was extremely well established the GPT is biased. Even OpenAI has a help ticket on this. Or the supposedly left-leaning Washington Post article ChatGPT leans liberal, research... Left Media Bias bigger than i realized. No matter how you measure (print media, online, page views, paid subscribers, followers, etc) US media leans heavily left, to an extent that surprised me. Most ways I tried back-of-the napkin math have right + right-leaning news sources being below 10%… and even the most generous assessments that include lost of neutral/other outlets still have left + left-leaning above 50% (meaning 5:1 liberal to conservative is the lowest estimate i could find).
Context
The US is pretty evenly split in terms of the two major parties:
> 45% of U.S. adults Republican-ish, 44% Democrat-ish Gallup 2022Some sources
- Allsides Here’s Allsides review
their media bias on Allsides.com here’s the site’s own assessment of its own bias - Googling the top 25 most-subscribed news channels in the United States, and
- Even the more left leaning LLMS can’t help but point out this as a fact of modern media.
Takeaways
First, this gives me empathy for Republicans. Many American conservatives feel like the underdog, regardless of how much power or influence they yield, because in a very real way, they’re not represented in a substantial part of the public narrative making machine—the media—proportionally. The perception of bias is true despite their being popular conservative outlets with sizable audiences, and as a result the left has influence on public opinion.Impact on Public Trust (but also how come Republicans aren’t better at getting media subscribers?)
Second, how come Republicans, who are stereotypically thought of us as having more business acumen or money or something, are getting so handily beaten in the media?
Third, I try not to get involved in politics because I’m scared of loosing connection or turning people off of the value of relatefulness because of my takes, even if they’re nuanced. We’re very good at otherizing people and forgetting to look at nuances. I’m certain I lack nuance. I don’t want a difference of political opinion to get in the way of our connecting. I started writing up this for the TTT email (which I ended up deciding not to send) but I realized others are deeply esconced in politics and way smarter and more educated in the field than I, so I decided to not go there. But here on uptrusting.com I think it’s a cool opporutnity to test; could also be a nice road to empathy, or self-empathy, depending on our identifications.
Fair enough- llms are not known for their accuracy. But in addition to the other data, I think it’s an interesting point that despite their fine tuning to be as neutral/tame-green-woke as possible, they couldn’t help but begrudgingly admit it (when I asked a few a while...