True, but I don't think that simple greed explains everything; when you have the 1%'ers possessing so much frkn $$ they could never spend it in their lifetime, there's got to be a deeper explanation.
Topic on UpTrust
A live feed of posts and discussions about social inequality, ranked by who the most trusted people trust, not by likes or follower counts.
Log in and start voting to get personalized rankings.
Trust ranks through the site stewards' curated lens.
True, but I don't think that simple greed explains everything; when you have the 1%'ers possessing so much frkn $$ they could never spend it in their lifetime, there's got to be a deeper explanation.
Are there any left who actually don't!
We have trillionaires
Sortition. I have never heard of that word before. What’s your take on it? (I don’t watch any t.v.)
& exactly! This isn’t about anything, really, but the ultra-wealthy vs. us, we the people.
Capatalism is designed for the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. So what is the suprise when it does exactly that?
Capatalism is designed for the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer, and so capatalism is alive and well. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.
Agree. They only care about the wealthy
> A lot of the wealth generated in the past 50-80 years could have been reinvested into the commons but instead was kept by the wealthiest families and institutions.
Why do you think this?